CTI Vario D: Investors in a dilemma – no repayments!

CTI Vario D: Investors in a dilemma – no repayments!

More and more investors in the CTI Vario D fund, which was initiated by the ThomasLloyd Group, are facing a difficult situation. Over the years, many investors have paid monthly installments of 50, 100 or 200 euros into this infrastructure investment in Asia without receiving any repayments. The promises associated with the fund included participation in sustainable projects and predictable returns. But the reality is different: the fund reported a net loss of €12.4 million in 2022, resulting in a negative return of -27%, while paid-up capital shrank to just €22.5 million. Investors report frustrating experiences, including continued collection of their installments and unanswered questions about the use of funds. In addition, there are significant legal concerns, in particular regarding incorrect advice at closing and the unlawful refusal of payment after termination, which is reflected in the reporting by anwalt.de is clarified.

Investors now find themselves in a difficult situation. There are two central legal points of attack: on the one hand, the insufficient information about the risk of total loss during the consultation and, on the other hand, the legal obligations that cannot be unilaterally questioned after termination. In fact, the statute of limitations for recovery claims often begins when losses are first known, meaning investors must act quickly to assert their claims. This problem is also addressed by akh-h.de addressed, with the Osnabrück regional court recently ruling in a similar case that an investor received back the money she had deposited.

Judgments and damages

In the judgment of July 24, 2024, the regional court declared that the plaintiff does not have to make any further payments in the installment savings model. Cleantech Treu Vermögens GmbH, as trustee, was held responsible for inadequate information about the risks of the investment - an aspect that is raised by investors in many other cases. This plaintiff invested 21,000 euros in CTI Vario in 2013 and has now received damages of 14,673.75 euros. In addition, the defendant is sentenced to release from further liabilities in the amount of 7,901.25 euros. The verdict is now legally binding, which gives hope to many affected investors akh-h.de reported.

The courts' decision-making underlines the importance of transparency and proper information in investment advice. Another case, that of ra-kotz.de documented, emphasizes that insufficient information in fund prospectuses can have serious legal consequences. Investors who have invested in similar schemes should consider whether they are entitled to compensation, particularly if they felt they were inadequately informed or their rights were violated.

Overall, many CTI Vario D investors continue to be exposed to great uncertainty. While court decisions offer hope for compensation, affected investors should seek legal advice to enforce their claims due to the ongoing problems with the fund. The case clearly shows how important a comprehensive legal review is in order to protect yourself against possible investment fraud.