Process for murder of language teacher: Iranian in court in Stuttgart!
A trial against a 38-year-old Iranian begins because of his 66-year-old language teacher in Nürtingen.

Process for murder of language teacher: Iranian in court in Stuttgart!
On July 3, 2025, the trial against a 38-year-old Iranian was opened before the district court in Stuttgart, who is accused of murdering his 66-year-old language teacher. The accused is said to have committed the crime on October 19, 2024 in the teacher's apartment in Nürtingen. According to the public prosecutor, the relationship between the two was shaped by the man's possessive behavior, which led to conflicts.
The relationship that began during a language course escalated when the language teacher expressed the desire to live a self -determined life and not to give up contact with other men. This is said to have led to a dispute between the two. The accused is accused of strangling the teacher in an emotional outbreak and biting her in the left cheek and in the right forearm before threw her body into the Neckar. The woman's body was discovered on October 20, 2024 by a passerby on a fish staircase.
Investigations and arrest
The police arrested the accused in a refugee accommodation in Oberboihingen a few days after the crime. The special commission "Ufer" was used to advance the investigation. The officials were able to gain important insights through testimony and the personal environment of the teacher. The process is headed by the 1st large criminal chamber under the chairmanship of Monika Lamberti and is scheduled to include a total of seven main hearing days by the end of July. A total of 13 witnesses are loaded for the process.
The tragedy around the death of the language teacher once again highlights the problem of violence in relationships and female. The intimate and violent dynamics, which often occur in such relationships, will also be addressed intensively in the course of the procedure. During the first days of the trial, the court has already discussed which evidence and testimony are relevant for finding the judgment. The process is being pursued with tension because it raises important social and legal questions.
The case not only shows the personal tragedies associated with such acts, but also the social challenges that need to be overcome in order to counteract such violent acts. Both the court and the public will have to deal with the serious implications of this act. Awareness and prevention are essential steps to counteract future violence.